'Software Marketing\r'

'Softw be is compose of m all programs that all together fulfill a certain task. Programs be strict instructions that regularize the computing machine what to do. A computer is a multiplex machine that uses directions same programs and parcel to operate, without it it”s useless. In early(a) terminology, packet brings life to a computer”s hardwargon. More precisely, it represents what fuel is to a car. in that location atomic number 18 two categories of softw atomic number 18 program program; direct systems and screenings. both of them are a necessity to unity”s computer. The first one is the largest program, and the most principal(prenominal) one.\r\nThis computer software deals with file management, memory management, provides a exploiter interface, and manages I/O devices bid markerers, and disk drives. Microsoft is well cognise for their Windows 95, and Windows NT operating systems, two of the most popular operating system on the market b ecause of its user-friendly features. however operating system desire Unix, and Linux are much cognise for their stability, and good performance. On the other hand, applications are smaller programs that fulfill a less important task.\r\nTo satisfy the user”s demand, programs are pen accordingly. For subject, a lot of word processor users pro farseeing the privilege of having programs wish well Word to help them. early(a) might like spread sheets, and use programs like Excel, or Lotus1-2-3. there are also database applications like Access, or programming compilers like Borland C++. each(prenominal) those application are very common for ain computers. This is why companies try to sell along with a computer an operating system, and a package of extremely demanded applications at the same time.\r\nOperating system, like application is expensive. Recently, companies have been offering emancipate version of software on the Internet for competition, or economic purpose s. because two new categories of software emerged; shareware (freeware), and proprietary software. First, shareware are software programs that are uncommitted to anyone who wishes to use it. Winzip for ideal can be d admitloaded from the Internet for free. Thanks to Microsoft, a multitude of useful software are available the same way, the most popular one is belike Internet explorer.\r\nAn important notice about shareware is that they”re not perpetrate programs, in other words the version downloaded is not as complete as the original one, but it still fits some user”s demands. That”s what counts. On the other hand, proprietary programs are exactly what a freeware program is not. In other words, it”s complete, expensive, and protected. Whit it comes a authorise that unauthorizes anyone to duplicate, copy, or install the purchased software. Any violation of this well(p) may lead to further implications. The purchase however allows the buyer to use the s oftware, not to copy it.\r\nThis leads to the colonial laws of willpower. To understand the meaning of ownership, it”s important to k this instantn what ownership is, and how it”s acquired. First, ownership means to own a property by proper(ip), therefore it”s a legal possession that ensure proprietorship. plump for ownership can be acquired in much then one way. By purchasing a house you can become a owner, if you create, find, or inherit a thing you therefore logically become the owner as well. For poser, if you find a gold mine you become the legal owner.\r\nThere is different cordial of ownership, and the most common one is certainly physical ownership. In this case the recipient is able to do whatsoever he wishes with his propriety. As an object, owners can use their properties as they want, as long as they”re not violating the law, or anyone”s rights. A house is a great example of physical ownership. The owner is able to do whatever he w ants to it, as long as he doesn”t endanger his neighbors. This is where ownership software becomes more delicate. Can software be treated in a comparable way? should it be considered as an object?\r\nThis question is complex, and this is why policies have been created for software copying. For example, if an individual buys a computer program, he buys the right to use that software as much as he wants. On the other hand, strict laws proscribe him to duplicate, or copy the actual software. Indeed as for books, videos, and songs there are copyright laws that govern software copying, and the violation of those laws are serious. Computer software are ideas that are translated in coding, therefore making duplicates is like stealing someone else”s idea; it”s plagiarism, that”s a crime.\r\nBy those laws, computer programmers are protected as well as writers, and signers. so they get the credit for their work. plainly this particular view of software copying is still uncertain, because authorities bust to enforce the law, and this is how computer software, videos, and songs are illegally copied eachday. Programmers do get credit, but they lose an enormous utility. other important kind of software ownership is called patent. This kind of ownership is a writing in publisher securing an invention. Like this, a programmer is given complete rights over his software.\r\nHe has the power to give, copy, install, uninstall, or exclusively give to a certain individual a copy of his program. This is how programmers are protected from other programmers that would like to develop a program closely similar to there”s. All this discussion about ownership seems to be so complex, therefore why isn”t software free for all to use? In a capitalist society like ours, the unsounded purpose of creating a product is to make shekels out of it. If not, why would you spend ten dollars to print a T-shirt, and sell it for free. This idea seems ridi culous.\r\nOn the other hand, individual like Richard Stallman claims that software ownership is stabbing to society. How is that? Computers engineering like any other businesses as to meet certain economic standars to suffer themselves. The patience of computers is constantly growing, and therefore more demanding in hurt of software. Before the Internet, word processors, and spreadsheets were very popular, but now Font page 98, and Internet Explore are one of the upcoming software in the business. directly the question is, why sell them for free when they”re creating huge profits?\r\nRichard Stallman debate is that it deprives people from employ the software. This is like saying that a BMW should be free, because it deprives the reduce class people from driving a luxuriousness car. Now does that make sense? In his article, his comparison to roads is completely false. Why? Simply because roads are not free, tax payers give each year a part of their salary to maintai n them, therefore should that mean that we should all pay for free software. Of course not, because the postulate of roads, is not comparable to needs computer software.\r\nRoads are a necessity, bandage computers are still optional. Stallman claims also that free software ownership damages social cohesion. Therefore, the fact of not copying software could hurt society. Does it mean that I”m being a bad citizen? Should this example be right for cars, houses, pay checks, etc… If so, it”s not going to happen any time soon. Stallman argument are week, and unrealistic. In other word they feign”t make sense. For the simple fact that every example used in his article are easily destroyed. Therefore, his arguments are incomplete.\r\nComputer science is constantly expanding, its therefore providing a great amount of profit to our society. As capitalist, the idea of giving computer software for free should not even be considered, still ignore, simply because it ma kes no sense for programmers, as it would for any other profession to give a do for free. This is why copyright laws have been set in order to regulate those that support Stallman”s theory. But still, the authorities fail to enforce those laws, therefore this trouble is far from being over. It”s very motiveless to get free software, especially with the arrival of CD writers.\r\n'