The Case Involving Garner against Tennessee Research Paper

The Case Involving Garner against Tennessee - Research Paper ExampleGarners father sued the practice of law officers, the mayor of the city Memphis and the specific police against breach of Garners right provided for under the Fourteenth, fourth and eight Amendments (Levy, Karst, and Winkler, 2000). He alleged that Hymon violated the rights of Garner when he shot and killed him. He sued the mayor of Memphis, and the police department because of their failure to effectively train Hymon and supervise him. He denotes that this contributed to the behavior of Hymon that made him kill Garner. He specifically used the 1871 civil rights act, section 42 which defend citizens against anyone who breached their rights in accordance with the United States Constitution (Pollock and Klotter, 2009). The district cost ruled in favor of the mayor, the police department and Hymon. The district court ruled that the Tennessee madly force statute was constitutional, and Hymon did not deprive Garner o f his constitutional rights. On solicitation, the court repealed the Tennessee deadly force statute, denoting that the law was unconstitutional, violating the fourteenth and the fourth amendment. The appeal court was particularly interested in the fact that fleeing suspect did not pose any danger to the police officers, or other people within the surrounding. The appeal court ruled that by killing a suspect who is unarmed, by officer violates the rights of such a person in regard to seizure adumbrate in the Fourth Amendment of the American constitution (Levy, Karst, and Winkler, 2000). The court, in the 1978 case involving department of Social services against Monell, denoted that it is possible to charge Municipal councils against liability. This was a case ambitious the constitutionality of the maternity policies of the Education Board of New York.