Marbury vs. Madison :: essays research papers

In the Supreme Court case of George Reynolds vs. United States, 1879, concerned an honest-to-goodness Mormon living in the Utah Territory under national laws, was charged with a violation of a federal law saturnine join in all federal territories. The pr operationice of tenfold marriage couples is a practice common among Mormons of that time period. The United States put into consequence a law the restricted multiple marriage couples upon receiving word that Mormons were base into the Utah Territory. Since the United States Government was founded on Judeo-Christian touchs, they frowned heavily on the Mormon practice and used their power to restrict their ability to act on their beliefs. The principle of democracy that is directly applicable to this situation is equation under the Law. George Reynolds took his case to the Supreme Court in objection that he could non fully pursue his worship. He argued that the low gear amendment guarantees that persons will be free from any law prohibiting the free exercise of religion. That no federal law could interfere with a persons religious belief or with actions based on those beliefs. That the federal law was unconstitutional and his execration should be overturned. In his eyes he was not being tempered fairly by the government because of what his religion believed was acceptable. He felt that multiple partner relationships should be allowed and that the United States was out of line in restrict that. The Supreme Court ruled that the case presented an obvious and compelling guide to regulate a question of behavior offensive to public will. The first amendment cannot be used as a shield to protect any person against criminal behavior. This view states that the first amendment cannot be used as an excuse to do whatever you want simply because your religion says thats ok to do. Mr. Reynolds is allowed to believe that multiple partners are acceptable, but he is not allowed to practice that belief, according to the law of the United States. The Supreme Court ruling was quite inaccurate in that they think Mormon beliefs are misemploy because they differ from their own beliefs. Because Mormon religion is a minority in this country, the rest of the United States feels that they have the right to regulate how the Mormon religion can and cannot be practiced. Mormons should be allowed to pursue their religion to the fullest extent without causing harm to himself or herself or any other individual.