Sunday, March 31, 2019

Limiting Reactant Effect on Lab

narrowing Reactant Effect on LabThe Limiting Reactant LabABSTRACTThe purpose of is lab is to chitchat how the alteration reactant set up the whole lab. To determine what the other check reactant was and how practically of reactant was thither.INTRODUCTIONACS4 alteration reactant limits the answer and controls the amount of product formed when balancing an equation and qualification calculations. When calculating a limiting reactant, two reactant masses given because erst the limiting reactant is g angiotensin-converting enzyme the reaction stops producing. Limiting reactant is the reactant that is completely utilize until there isnt any more of it and then the reactant will stop. (Shah, 2007) (Buthelezi, Dingrando, Hainen, Winstrom, Zike, 2013). Hypothesis is proposed that if there is a sufficient amount of iron that the squealer would not be precipitated.MATERIALSRing StandFilter PaperDi sleek overed WaterStirring terminalPipestem triangleBalanceCopper(II) sulfate100m L beakerWire screenWeigh cups straighten break filings250mL beakersBunsen burnerMETHODSThe mass of 100mL beaker was measured using a balance. The mass of the fight cups were taken using a balance, also. 8 grams of copper sulfate crystals were measured using a balance and placed into the 100mL beaker. A graduated cylinder was used to measure step up 50 mL of water out to add into the crystals. A Bunsen burner was lit under the ring prevail with the wire screen on the ring clamp holding the 100mL beaker and substances in place. The beaker was heated and stirred until just before it began to boil, then the gasconade was come together off to stop the flame CS5and the solution began to cool. 1.3 grams of iron filings were stirred into the lively copper sulfate crystals. The 100mL beaker was leave to cool for ten minutes eon observing the reaction taking place. A sheet of pervade makeup was taken including initials written CS6on it and weighed. A filtration system was made a nd placed into a funnel. The funnel was placed over an ECS7. flask. The liquid was poured slowly into the funnel deprivation through the CS8filter topic and into the flask. With tap water the beaker was rinsed. When the solid settledCS9, the beaker was rinsed two more times, until all of the solid was transferred to the filter paper. The filter paper was placed onto a watch grouch and then placed into the oven. Once it is cooledCS10, the mass of the beaker, filter paper and solid were recorded.RESULTSTheCS11 Limiting Reactants limit the reaction. Once the limiting reactant is goneCS12 the reaction stops, it determines the amount of the product being produced. Single replacement reaction is a chemical reaction happens when certain atoms in one replace the atoms in another elementCS13. IfCS14 you dontCS15 balance and record your numbers then you cannot keep course of how much you have, and then it can make youCS16 to use too much or to less of needed for the chemical reaction. Usi ng dirty glass wearCS17 can affect the weightsCS18 and the reaction occurringCS19.MassCS20 of empty 100mL beaker70gMass of copper (II) sulfate8.0gMass of iron filings1.3gSubstance collected3.0gMass of filter paper2.0gMolesCS21 of copper (II) sulfate equaled out to be 0.08 moles because 8.0 grams of copper sulfate calculate by one mole of copper sulfate split by 96g of copper sulfate equaled 0.08 moles. The amount of iron added to the solution calculated out to be 0.02 molFe because 1.3 multiply by one mole Fe divided by 56 grams Fe equals 0.02molFe. There were 0.05 moles of substance produced repayable to 3 grams being multiplied by 1 and divided by 64 grams and equals to 0.05 moles of substance. Moles of iron metal reactant came out to be 2.8 moles because 8 grams multiplied 1 mole divided by 160 grams multiplied by 56 grams equals 2.8 moles. Copper (II) sulfate starts with 3 grams divided by 56 grams multiplied by 160 grams equals 8.57 moles CuSO4CS22. CS23The limiting reactant is the iron metal. Its the lowest numberCS24. The CuSO4 was the excess due to having more left over an exact amount of 8.57 moles. The only delusion CS25that occurred in the lab would be the beaker not being quite as clean as needed In correct recordingCS26 of the IronCS27 filings. AlsoCS28 that SomeCS29 of the iron was still built up along the berths of the beakerCS30. Some of the iron came out CS31before it reached the beaker with the copper (II) sulfate.CS1APA format says that the running head should be left aligned and summon number right aligned. The title of your lab should also be in all caps.CS2 beguile do not use . Either use a comma or the word and.CS3Your rear is missing. Please create a new page, make a center and bold headway Abstract, and complete. Your abstract should be a summary of the purpose of the lab and your findings.CS4Paragraphs should be indented.CS5Shutting the gas off stopped the flame. Please be specific and explain that instead.CS6Third somebodyCS7 Spell out the name.CS8And would work here alsoCS9commaCS10commaCS11The first line of the carve up is indented only.CS12commaCS13Please clarify.CS14Just so this lab report will flow a unretentive better, please put a sentence here about electromotive force errors could have been caused by these things in the sentences that follow.CS15Please dont use contractions.CS16Third person, please. Try something like it would be possible to .CS17This should be spelled ware.CS18massesCS19If you say this, you need to explain how. Dirty glassware causes masses to be falsely increased due to contaminants or side reactions that use up the reactants to make an undesired product.CS20Put in a heading to label this table as Table 1. It should be bold and left aligned.CS21Please left alignCS22This needs subscript.CS23This is very difficult to read. Please see me for correct format. Also, instead of going by the calculations listed in the form, calculate limiting reactant and excess in grams the way we did in class.CS24Instead of this, it needs to be specific. The limiting reactant was iron metal since calculations indicated that the smallest amount of copper could be produced.CS25Many errors are possible. Please mention incorrect measurements, faulty balances, side reactions due to dirty glassware.CS26Incorrect is one wordCS27This does not need to be capitalized.CS28commaCS29Do not capitalizeCS30Remained in the beakerCS31Came out? How did it come out? Be specific. Mention sticking to the weigh boat, spilling, or some other means of losing the iron.

No comments:

Post a Comment